IFReviewed by Paul OBrian on 2006-07-19 08:34
This game has one of the most startling first lines I've ever encountered. The line is this: "Welcome to Jarod's Journey, a TADS-based game that will hopefully get you and Jarod closer to God." This line brought up a couple of questions for me. The first was "Whose God?", and the second was "What gives you the right?" I'm agnostic, but I wouldn't scorn someone simply for their religious beliefs. I respect the desire and necessity of all people to find their own spiritual paths, and I expect to receive the same respect in return. A game that wants to bring me closer to what it calls God is violating what I see as a very personal boundary, the boundary around my soul and my spiritual life. My agnosticism is of the stripe that objects to the notion that any human has privileged access to any sort of Higher Truth. I find it deluded and arrogant when a person claims to have all the answers to the Big Questions, even when they're basing that claim on some kind of intense personal experience, but I respect that person's right to believe whatever feels right to them. However, when they want to proselytize to me (or to anybody else, really), that's when I get offended. I think people have the right to believe whatever they want, but I don't believe they have the right to evangelize others about it -- doing so runs roughshod over those others' right to believe what they want. Consequently, I found the basic goal of Jarod's Journey to be an offensive one.
That being said, I'll try to set aside my fundamental personal objections to the game's announced intent and review it simply as IF. Sadly, it doesn't have much to recommend it, even from a pure gaming standpoint. First of all, it crossed another big bias of mine by having, you guessed it, a starvation puzzle. Actually, two starvation puzzles. Strangely, there doesn't appear to be any actual consequence attached to the starvation. Jarod, the PC, never dies, no matter how long he starves, but the game continues to print annoying messages. It could be argued that these are better than typical starvation puzzles since they don't ever actually enforce a time limit, but I say that they're just as bad, because without the time limit they become entirely pointless instead of just mostly pointless. In addition, there are a disheartening number of spelling and grammar errors in the game's writing, which makes the whole thing seem less than divinely inspired. On top of this, there's the fact that although the game tries to maintain a third-person voice, there are little slips of second-person throughout, as in this scene:
Jarod is in a dream, or at least he thinks it is a dream. The
angel is here and has delivered a map.
You see a map here.
There is an angel here who is slightly glowing!
If the player controls Jarod, who is the "you" that sees the map? Perhaps it's the same "you" that the game announces in the first line that it wants to convert -- that is, me? But I
don't see a map, just a computer game. Or rather, a digital sermon. (One nice thing about JJ is that next time somebody tells me that LASH
is preachy, I can point at this game and say, Crocodile Dundee
-style, "That isn't preachy. THIS is preachy!")
Setting aside the game's deficiencies in the areas of design, prose mechanics, and coding, we come at last to the quality of the writing itself. Jarod's Journey is written in a kind of earnest, gee-whiz tone that works best when you imagine it being read aloud by Ned Flanders from the Simpsons. (And by "works best", I mean "is most entertaining.") An example:
>ask angel about god
"God is wonderful. He loves you very much and created you just as you
>ask angel about grace
Jarod asks the angel about grace. The angel responds saying "Grace is
truly wonderful! You will not find a better gift!"
Jarod thinks to himself, "The angel is truly magnificent, glowing
ever so brightly."
Okeley-dokeley-do! Don't get the impression that I scowled through this game. On the contrary, I laughed a lot, but only because it was difficult to take this wide-eyed tone seriously. On a more serious level, though, perhaps it's worth thinking about the model of Christianity that this game constructs for us. There's one section that I found quite ironic -- Jarod meets a pharisee who is described as "praying loudly. So loudly that everyone nearby can hear him. Even in the short time that Jarod pauses to listen, it is obvious that the man is repeating himself. Is this what pleases the Lord?" From this description, we're supposed to realize that the pharisee's method of prayer is Not OK. But only one location away is a Christian priest who fits this same exact description. Not only that, the game itself
fits this description. The deep irony of the pharisee section made me suspect that not only is the game evangelical, its evangelism isn't even well thought out. Another example: at the end of each section of the game, Jarod is asked to make a spiritual choice between various methods of approaching God. If you pick the right one, you get a point. If not, you get chided with a scripture. Is the sacred realm of faith really so simple as that? Can the intricacies of individual worship really be boiled down to a multiple choice test? According to the game, apparently so. The best religious literature explores the mysteries
of faith rather than handing out reductionist platitudes. Dante
knew this. Chaucer
knew it. Lewis
knew it. Jarod... Well, Jarod still has quite a ways to go.